 | | VinoCellar.com Wine Forums | |
| |
| |
Removing Names from User List | Sort: |
|  Prev Next | You are not authorized to post a reply. | |
Binski  
South Bay
Grape Fermenter
Posts: 457
 | | 11-28-2005 06:37 AM |
| Would it make sense to remove all the names from the user list that have not posted a single post, going back 1 to 3 years and allow that name to be used again by new members? I have noticed that there are alot of names, but no activity on a lot of them. Any thoughts about this? | | | "Why Keep Score if you are not going to play by the rules?" |
|
|
Bradley Molzen
VinoCellar.com Admin
Bayonne, NJ
Wine Connoisseur
Posts: 5054
| | 11-28-2005 01:12 PM |
| | Thanks for the post. I can't really say I've thought about it however. Is 1300 names really that many? | | | If you drink wine, you get smarter.... | |
| Binski
South Bay
Grape Fermenter
Posts: 457
| | 11-28-2005 11:35 PM |
| | Not as many as you would like, just think if all of them were active? I would have to think that many of them have forgot their password (which is really easy to get back) or have forgotten all about VC. Just a thought. | | | "Why Keep Score if you are not going to play by the rules?" | |
| Brent Null
Roseville, CA
Barrel Sampler
Posts: 2194
| | 11-29-2005 10:23 PM |
| | Just because someone doesn't post doesn't mean that they don't participate on VC. Lurkers participate all the time. We should not remove their name from the user list simply because they choose to lurk rather than post. | | | |
| Rothko
Palm Beach
Wine Connoisseur
Posts: 5706
| | 11-29-2005 10:34 PM |
| | It does seem to make sense to set a timelimit for non-use of a name, though. If someone hasn't posted in a year, I don't think it is a radical approach to remove their name from the active member list. | | | |
| ChangeMe
Master of Wine
Posts: 11169
| | 11-30-2005 02:38 AM |
| | I don't think it makes any difference unless you're paging through the user list. | | | |
| David Niederauer
Los Gatos, CA
Master Sommelier
Posts: 15756
| | 11-30-2005 02:42 AM |
| Leave it the way it is.
I know a couple of lurkers that never want to post. They are signed up so that they can get the "new and post""last post read" features. I would hate to shut them down. | | | |
| Brent Null
Roseville, CA
Barrel Sampler
Posts: 2194
| | 11-30-2005 02:43 AM |
| Quote:
It does seem to make sense to set a timelimit for non-use of a name, though. If someone hasn't posted in a year, I don't think it is a radical approach to remove their name from the active member list.
But just because someone hasn't posted doesn't mean they are not active. I consider lurking being active.
Brad: Is there any way to run stats on users who don't post to see if they even lurk? | | | |
| Bradley Molzen
VinoCellar.com Admin
Bayonne, NJ
Wine Connoisseur
Posts: 5054
| | 11-30-2005 03:41 AM |
| Brent, not really... at least, not without a lot of effort.
At this point I don't feel I'll be doing anything, but will keep the suggestion in mind. | | | If you drink wine, you get smarter.... | |
|
| You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
|
| |
| |
|
| | Proposed Change to American Viticultural Area Naming Standards Monday, March 10, 2008
| Wine Primers - Links to Your Wine Education Tuesday, February 12, 2008
| Wine Country Report: Day trip to the Willamette Valley Monday, February 11, 2008
| VinoCellar's Favorite Wine Links Saturday, February 09, 2008
| Wine Retailer Reports - Thanks Winetex! Monday, February 04, 2008
|
|
| |
| |
| |  | Membership: |  | Latest:cmsyrah |  | New Today:0 |  | New Yesterday:1 |  | Overall:2078 |
 | People Online: |  | Visitors:63 |  | Members:14 |  | Total:77 |
|
|
| |
| |
|