Sunday, September 07, 2008                 Register

VinoCellar.com Wine Forums
Subject: 2003 Juan Gil
Prev Next
You are not authorized to post a reply.

AuthorMessages
JimUser is Offline
Grape Stomper
Grape Stomper
Posts:182


10/22/2005 4:16 AM  
2003 Bodegas Juan Gil Jumilla - Spain, Murcia, Jumilla (10/21/2005)
A very enjoyable bottle...maybe the best one yet. Dark in the glass. Balanced on the palate with plush, red and black fruit flavors. The finish presents a bit of sweet and sour, puckering tannins and oak. Very nice (90 pts.)
Posted from CellarTracker
Blair RidleyUser is Offline
Wine Labeler
Wine Labeler
Posts:3980


10/22/2005 11:59 AM  
Thanks for the note, 6831. This is one of those QPRs that several local stores have piled to the season (I think).

I'll pick one up as a tester.
ChangeMeUser is Offline
Grape Destemmer
Grape Destemmer
Posts:77


10/22/2005 6:13 PM  
Quote:

2003 Bodegas Juan Gil Jumilla - Spain, Murcia, Jumilla (10/21/2005)
A very enjoyable bottle...maybe the best one yet. Dark in the glass. Balanced on the palate with plush, red and black fruit flavors. The finish presents a bit of sweet and sour, puckering tannins and oak. Very nice (90 pts.)





Just had this one last night too. I agree with 6831's note. The wine in the bottle got even better a night after it's opened. I'd get a case for everyday drinking. 89-91pts
love_cab_chardUser is Offline
Master of Wine
Master of Wine
Posts:12501


11/14/2005 3:44 PM  
$13, retail.

Not decanted, but needs about 20-30 mins of air. But, don’t allow too much air time as not to over decant it.

Another very good Spanish wine for the price. I have to say that I’ve ran into many solid bottles of Spanish wines in the $8.00-$15.00 range. And, this is one of those value-type, solid bottles for the price that I paid. I would recommend trying a bottle or 2 if you are looking to purchase wine(s) in this price range.

I don’t see the 91 points that Parker gave it. And, I guess it did not make an impression on me as it did on Phyll & 6831. But, a pretty good bottle nonetheless.

Rating: 86 points, drink or hold.
TBirdUser is Offline
Park Slope, Brooklyn
Wine Connoisseur
Wine Connoisseur
Posts:5219


12/16/2005 12:22 AM  
just finished the last of a case of this one too.
Eric WhiteUser is Offline
San Ramon, CA
Advanced Sommelier
Advanced Sommelier
Posts:9258


12/17/2005 6:42 PM  
Tbird, I am always amazed at how similar our tastes seem to run - I'm having a hard time keeping my hands off this stuff.
calcabsUser is Offline
Grape Fermenter
Grape Fermenter
Posts:453


12/23/2005 5:39 PM  
Finished one of these last night. My impression the first night was that the wine seemed overly sweet and jammy an impression I often fine with these wines however the finish was a bit sharp with tannin. It was ok but not what I was in the mood for, I decided to vacu-vin and revisit in 24 hours. After 24 hours the wine was much better aromas of blueberries and vanilla followed by the same flavors with a touch of plum and carmel flavors. The finsish was much smoother on day 2. I would give this 85pts a decent QPR that a lot of people would probably enjoy at a party but open first.

LCC - This is to me is another example similar to our discussion on the Winners Tank. Decent wine for the money just don't understand the Parker rating.
You are not authorized to post a reply.



ActiveForums 3.7

Related Links

VinoCellar Updates

 


Who's Online
MembershipMembership:
Latest New UserLatest:pitch9
New TodayNew Today:1
New YesterdayNew Yesterday:0
User CountOverall:2056

People OnlinePeople Online:
VisitorsVisitors:100
MembersMembers:3
TotalTotal:103


Where Are They
Members Where Are They:
Eric White : Wine Forums
R8der . : Wine Forums
Anonymous User [42] : Home
Anonymous User [54] : Wine Forums
Anonymous User [1] : My Messages
Anonymous User [1] : Wine Search
Anonymous User [1] : Wine Links
Anonymous User [1] : Wine Videos

Privacy Statement    |    Terms Of UsePage generated in 0.109375 seconds.    |    Copyright 2002-2008 by Revlus, Inc.