Friday, July 04, 2008                 Register

VinoCellar.com Wine Forums
Subject: 2000 Quilceda Creek Cabernet Sauvignon
Prev Next
You are not authorized to post a reply.
             

Page 9 of 9 << < 123456789
AuthorMessages
ChangeMeUser is Offline
Grape Stomper
Grape Stomper
Posts:192


10/26/2005 4:33 PM  
Quote:

The latter.




I hope you are right. I won't touch my other one for at least 4-5 years.
Wine NightlyUser is Offline
Grape Stomper
Grape Stomper
Posts:124


01/20/2006 4:44 AM  

Posted from CellarTracker
WinetexUser is Offline
Austin, Texas
Master of Wine
Master of Wine
Posts:10570


05/18/2006 4:03 PM  
This is probably not the Quilceda for the ages as were subsequent vintages. But very good especially if you were to decant it for a while before drinking. We took this to a restaurant with just a splash decant.

  • 2000 Quilceda Creek Cabernet Sauvignon - USA, Washington (5/17/2006)

    This wine seemed further along than the blueberry bonanza it was in the past. The flavors are more in the kirsch/raspberry range along with a tiny streak of minerals. It still has upside but not long term (10 years+) IMHO. I'm going to schedule them every six months since we have quite a few left. Tasty. (92 pts.)


Posted from CellarTracker
WinetexUser is Offline
Austin, Texas
Master of Wine
Master of Wine
Posts:10570


01/07/2008 2:20 PM  
The fact that there was some left in the decanter is all you need to know.  Proving that there are good wines and good bottles and then there are good wines and lesser bottles.  It wasn't bad but definitely wasn't better than good.

I had two lots of this wine but didn't mark them so that might be one explanation.  One lot was directly from the winery and the other through a retail outlet/distributor.

  • 2000 Quilceda Creek Cabernet Sauvignon - USA, Washington (1/6/2008)
    Not much to add other than last night's bottle had a very hot streak in it that detracted from the rest of the wine. Disjointed in a way that previous bottles were not. [Decanted 30 minutes and needed it; 14.9% alcohol] (90 pts.)




Posted from CellarTracker


jasonUser is Offline
Napa Valley
Wine Addict
Wine Addict
Posts:6823


01/07/2008 2:48 PM  
I think you are being nice, how does a disjointed wine with a hot streak get 90pts. ;)
WinetexUser is Offline
Austin, Texas
Master of Wine
Master of Wine
Posts:10570


01/07/2008 3:27 PM  
Nah, I'm not that nice.  It did taste pretty good minus the alcohol.

My husband's first comment was "whoa, that has some burn".
love_cab_chardUser is Offline
Master of Wine
Master of Wine
Posts:12349


04/27/2008 5:56 PM  
Hmm, an entirely different experience last night from a mag. We all LOVED it! Right next to me were the Jazins, Jimmy & friends, & Ojeffsos. And, we all loved it, a great wine. And, I go with WA's 93+. The wine was great last night, impressive bottle of wine. Actually, the mag was not decanted @ all & it was more approachable than I expected. A great showing last night.
WinetexUser is Offline
Austin, Texas
Master of Wine
Master of Wine
Posts:10570


04/27/2008 6:04 PM  
That is good to hear. I was wondering about the mags of this wine. Wish we could have joined you guys. I'm bummed we had to cancel our trip.
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 9 of 9 << < 123456789

Forums > Tasting Notes -- North America > Washington State -TNs > 2000 Quilceda Creek Cabernet Sauvignon



ActiveForums 3.7

Related Links

VinoCellar Updates

 


Who's Online
MembershipMembership:
Latest New UserLatest:figodeng
New TodayNew Today:1
New YesterdayNew Yesterday:1
User CountOverall:2004

People OnlinePeople Online:
VisitorsVisitors:80
MembersMembers:4
TotalTotal:84


Where Are They
Members Where Are They:
Jeff Mazen : Wine Forums
shaferguy91 . : Wine Forums
Anonymous User [35] : Home
Anonymous User [47] : Wine Forums

Privacy Statement    |    Terms Of UsePage generated in 0.203125 seconds.    |    Copyright 2002-2008 by Revlus, Inc.